Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Reading List Round-Up 2012: Books 26-33

No, I haven't abandoned my very ambitious 2012 reading project (although I am running more behind than I would like at nearly the halfway mark-- in my defense, most of this month's books were looong!).  Here's what I've been reading in between hours and hours of May sweeps television.

One Second After by William R. Forstchen

This novel offers a unique blend of extreme arrogance and near-batshit levels of conspiracy theory insanity (although, it did have a foreword by one Newt Gingrich, so maybe I was more surprised than I should have been), and a complete lack of mastery in prose writing to boot.  One Second After landed on my list because its premise sounded intriguing (and hey, joking aside, I do appreciate a good conspiracy theory every now and again), but it absolutely fails to deliver the epic, thought-provoking tale it promises.  Not only does Forstchen need to take remedial fiction (and basic English) classes, he's also (painfully obviously) cast himself as the hero and protagonist, a professor who happens to be an ex-military specialist upon whom the burden of heroism falls.  I'll let you check this one out yourself if you're still interested after this less than encouraging review, but if you're looking for my honest advice (and I know you always are), I'd say pass it up in favor of a different post-apocalyptic tale, of which there are many superior options.

The Grief of Others by Leah Hager Cohen

 This is an odd book that tells an almost touching story through the eyes of almost likable characters.  The family in the novel is meant to represent the average American middle class nuclear unit, although by the end of the book it emerges as more of an unwitting caricature than anything else.  Also, also, there is a character named Biscuit.  No, I'm not joking.  Biscuit.  All the names in the wide universe and that is the name Cohen has chosen for this family's daughter.  That should tell you something about the kind of book this is.

A Clash of Kings by George R. R. Martin

This is the book that makes slogging through Martin's first tome worth every minute.  A Clash of Kings is much, much easier to dive into headfirst now that most of the characters and story lines have been established, and on the whole it moves at a much faster pace than its predecessor.  There is no shortage of shocking, hilarious, and downright epic events within this volume's pages, the television adaptation of which is currently airing on HBO, but the characters who truly stand out in this installment are the fiercely brave Arya Stark (my favorite character of all), the too-witty-for-everyone Tyrion Lannister, and the utterly corruptible Theon Greyjoy.  This one leaves you absolutely itching for the next book while still managing to tell a fully-realized story of its own, which as one book in a lengthy saga can often be a difficult task.

The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie

 Good vs. Evil?  Check.  Stories within stories?  Check.  Tales of struggles, difficult choices, and innumerable regrets?  Check.  This one's a classic for a reason, people, and though it can be tricky to follow and downright slow at times, it is worth the slog.

The Social Animal by David Brooks

This is an immensely interesting, if vaguely self-important, study of how humans interact with one another and with the world.  Brooks frames his multitude of studies and stats in an interesting way, with fictional characters and a detailed account of their lives, love, and careers, and the hypotheses put forth are certainly thought-provoking, though the reader ought to take them with a grain of salt, lest the burden of responsibility for our own actions and behaviors be too much relieved.

The Alchemist by Paolo Cuehlo

This book is beautiful, beautiful, beautiful.  It's a simple story and doesn't take long at all to read, so really there's no excuse to pass it up.  It reminds you what it means to truly follow your heart, and will revive that spark of hope inside you, the one that our busy lives often tamps down to the point of no return. If it doesn't accomplish this, well then I hate to break it to you, but you might be dead inside.

Why We Broke Up by Daniel Handler

If I had to categorize this book in a way that suits it best, I'd say it's almost Young Adult for Adults.  Why We Broke Up is the exploration of a high-school relationship and it's inevitable dissolution, but Handler writes it in a way that better befits one looking back on the innocence and erstwhile novelty of such experiences rather than teenagers who are living it now.  That said, it is perhaps a bit unrealistic for the characters, particularly narrator Min, to possess the self-understanding and insight that they do, but it does add a dimension to the story that sets it apart from the onslaught of woebegone adolescent love stories (most of them involving vampires, werewolves, and all other manner of mystical creature) currently flooding the market.  Oh, and there are illustrations, which is awesome.

Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert 

When you're reading a book and your predominant thought in the first few chapters is, "yup, I can see how this is a Julia Roberts movie," it doesn't really bode well for the narrative or intellectual integrity of the book.  Gilbert has an admirable mission, but it's difficult to take many of her insights completely seriously, drowned out as they are by her nearly endless whining about the woes which drove her to this year of self discovery in the first place (primarily relationship troubles).  Forgive me my lack of sympathy for wealthy, liberated, WASP women, but I just can't shake the feeling that a journey like this would have far more depth coming from a different storyteller.

Best Book:  Tie, The Alchemist and A Clash of Kings
Worst Book:  Tie, Eat Pray Love and One Second After
Fastest Read:  Why We Broke Up
Slowest Read:  The Satanic Verses



Sunday, May 6, 2012

TV Review: Parks and Recreation--Bus Tour



In season four's penultimate episode the loyal Knope2012 team is forced to use its final days of campaigning to overcome no small number of unforeseen obstacles, including but not limited to a broken bus rental agreement, Chris' lady troubles, a would-be pie assassin (don't worry, Burt Macklin was on the case), and of course, death.  And at the end of the day, Leslie and company find themselves about as certain as the rest of us as to whether she will emerge the victor in next week's finale, "Win Lose or Draw."

Though Leslie makes up for some of her (colossal) missteps by the episode's end, mostly due to Bobby Newport's naivete, there is still a lingering feeling of doubt in many viewers' minds.  I've found myself thinking of this election the same way I would any non-fiction one, wondering if Leslie has succeeded as a politician, and if her earnestness and candor will be enough to overcome the inherent corruption of politics, even local (and fictional) politics.  I also can't wait to see how this will be handled from a writing standpoint.  As we've all surely read by now, Mike Schur has been quoted on multiple occasions as saying that they've shot three different endings to next Thursday's finale, as per the title:  a victory, a loss, and a draw.  And what's more, his statement of only a few weeks ago warned us of his own uncertainty, and the possibility of a last-minute game change.  I'm hoping there will be a healthy dose of suspense in next week's episode, ideally even some kind of fake-out or last minute twist, because if I have to go to sleep that night heartbroken on Leslie's behalf, I want to at least feel like the journey was worth it. 

Some of the other things going on in the midst of Leslie's scramble to get back on Bobby Newport and the press's good side must be applauded, namely Andy's latest (and most hilarious) turn as Burt Macklin, erstwhile FBI agent.  His investigation of the pie incident, the reenactments of the crime (assisted by Jerry, naturally), and the code names he assigns--all of it is just about perfection, and a welcome lighter contrast to the semi-seriousness of Leslie's plot in this episode.  Chris Pratt has proven once again that he is a performer not to be taken lightly by any means, and that he ought to be a serious contender for some of this year's comedy accolades.

Also, Leslie's cold open, envisioning Obama at her swearing in?  Absolute perfection.

Basically, there's no way next week's finale could really disappoint me, or fail to bring this just about perfect season to a close.  In fact, I'm pretty damn certain it will prove more satisfying than any of us are anticipating.  Just think, in four days' time the results will be in, and we'll be all set for three months of television nowhere near the standard that has been set by Parks and Recreation this season.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year, Part 2

So what I've learned over the past week or so is that May sweeps as we once knew it basically doesn't exist anymore.  For one thing, it apparently starts in April now, which bumps the whole schedule forward by several weeks (remember back in the day when the season finale of your favorite shows would coincide with the last days of school?).  Most of the shows discussed below will end in the first two weeks of may, and have already begun to ramp up their plot lines accordingly.  Let's get to it.


Parks and Recreation

Last week's "The Debate" continues to present new things for me to gush about (especially now that I've watched the director's cut, which has even more glorious extra laughs).  And things are only going to get more exciting from here.  The remaining two episodes will determine Leslie's political fate, and rumor has it there are going to be some major complications before the end of the race.
*I've already watched this evening's episode, "Bus Tour," and am holding off on elaborating here so I can post a better review later.


Grey's Anatomy

I have to applaud the current arc centering on the residents taking their medical boards, which I thought might grow tedious but which has been really very interesting to watch.  It's the first time in a while that Grey's has really emphasized the journey each character is on as an individual, rather than simply exploring their romantic relationships with one another.  The hype for the finale has been on the rise for a few weeks now, with several cast members cryptically giving interviews about how anyone's death is fair game in the season finale, due to air May 17th (although rumor has it Meredith, Alex, and Christina are safe, at least from death).  Of course, anyone following the show knows that this has more to do with ongoing contract negotiations with the actors than anything on the creative side, but it definitely feels like things are in flux, and that everything is about to change, for better or for (probably) worse over at Seattle Grace-Mercy West.


New Girl

(Yes, this is the overrated freshman show I was talking about in my previous post.)  Although the writers and actors seem to have finally found something of a groove in terms of humor, storytelling, and minimizing the "isn't she ador(k)able?" aspect of Zooey Deschanel's character, I still think the finale of this show's first season will be (somehow) both predictable and anti-climactic.  Fans are rooting for a Jess and Nick hookup with a fervor reminiscent of the early seasons of Friends and the Ross/Rachel tension.  Now, New Girl could potentially pull off a satisfying conclusion and/or cliffhanger if they go a similar route (that is, resolving it and not resolving it simultaneously, a la season 1 of Friends, where Rachel goes to the airport having realized her feelings only to see Ross with Julie).  I predict that by the end of next Tuesday's episode, either Nick or Jess will have an epiphany of sorts (though it could be argued that Jess kind of did at the end of this week's installment), but I doubt that anything with a clear resolution will happen.  I'd also like to see Nick go through with his decision to move out of the loft, if only because it presents more possibilities for the start of season 2.


Cougar Town

Jules and Grayson are going to get married, which is probably the official moment this show will demand a new title, as there is no substantial age difference between the two.   But rumor has it that Laurie might be assuming the role of a cougar of sorts, if the murmurs of something real happening between her and Travis are to be believed.  My only reservation with this story line is that if the writers aren't careful about handling it, they may run into the same criticism that plagued the show in its early days about how appropriate and/or realistic its interpretation of relationships is.  As someone who's been very happy to see how far this show has come since the pilot, I'm hoping they can pull off an acknowledgement of the palpable chemistry between these two characters in a way that fits with the show we know and love.